이 콘텐츠는 화면으로 보는 정리 자료입니다 — hanttam.kr/re 에서 확인하세요.
2026년 6월 고2 모의고사 20번
부분과 전체 · 컷 6
주제도입▸ 도입 · 컷 1
예시◆ 예시 · 컷 2
핵심주장→ 이어서 · 컷 3
이유설명∵ 이유설명 · 컷 4
예시◆ 예시 · 컷 5
결론∴ 결과 · 컷 6
0 / 6컷 해석 확인
We can sometimes assume that the whole will be as good as each of its parts. Suppose, for example, you're in charge of a startup, and you know that everyone you've brought on board is productive and efficient. It might seem logical to assume that, as a result, the startup will be productive and efficient, too ─ but this isn't necessarily true. The fallacy of composition fails to allow for how the different "parts" interact with each other ─ if, for example, your efficient administrator and your highly skilled head of IT each assumes the other is in charge of collating prototype test results, then you have a problem. Equally, a unit composed of good people can still be working on a doomed project, and a project composed of good ideas may lack a stable center. When assembling a team with a common goal, always check the overall view as well as the individuals involved.