이 콘텐츠는 화면으로 보는 정리 자료입니다 — hanttam.kr/re 에서 확인하세요.
2025년 10월 고2 모의고사 지문 16
쓰레기 vs 서비스 · 컷 8
주제도입▸ 도입 · 컷 1
이유설명→ 이어서 · 컷 2
이유설명∴ 결과 · 컷 3
예시◆ 예시 · 컷 4
부연설명■ 정리 · 컷 5
반론↔ 반대로 · 컷 6
과정설명→ 부연설명 · 컷 7
결론∴ 결과 · 컷 8
0 / 8컷 해석 확인
Waste has historically been seen as a necessary driver of the economy. Sales are tied to the amount of a product supplied, which is directly dependent on the demand for that product. Therefore, if you design the product to eventually be wasted, you can ensure that the demand for more products will be sustained. Many strategies have been incorporated into product design and use to ensure that waste is inevitable, such as planned obsolescence, limited access to tools for repairs, and use of cheap materials. All these strategies ensure that the consumer will have limited access to the product in use and will eventually require a replacement. Those who supported the idea that waste is necessary to drive demand failed to realize that prioritizing the elimination of waste via repair and remanufacturing creates a different kind of demand: products as a service. Through this setup, companies simply lease out products that were once sold directly to the customer. With this transition of ownership, companies maintain profit by offering maintenance and repair services and are encouraged to develop long-lasting products.